A civil society call for the EU
to withdraw its GATS water requests


Home

Site Map

About Us

Contact Us

Press Statements

Position Papers   

Basic Documents

Resolutions

Affiliates

Links

 

June 3, 2003
June 2003   --   pdf version of this document


The G8 meets this week on the shores of Lake Geneva, in Evian. Appropriately, the summit has identified water as one of its key themes, with talk of a 'global plan' to meet the Millennium Development Goal of halving the proportion of people without access to safe drinking water and sanitation by 2015.

Yet across the lake, in Geneva itself, EU trade negotiators are using the services negotiations of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to open up other countries' water sectors for the benefit of Europe's private sector water industry. Under the 'progressive liberalisation' programme of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), the EU has targeted the water sectors of 72 other WTO member countries for liberalisation - including developed, developing and least developed countries alike.

The EU has made no secret of the fact that it sees GATS as "first and foremost an instrument for the benefit of business, and not only for business in general, but for individual service companies wishing to export services or to invest and operate abroad." Building on the EU's attempt to include 'water for human use' under the category of environmental services in the current GATS negotiations, an internal memo from the European Commission to Thames Water confirmed:

One of the main objectives of the EU in the new round of negotiations is to achieve real and meaningful market access for European service providers for their exports of environmental services.

European service providers dominate the global water market. The world's top two private sector water companies, Vivendi and Suez (both French), control 70% of all private water services between them. The third largest is Thames Water, now part of German utilities conglomerate RWE. For these companies and their smaller competitors (most also European), GATS promises access to new markets and enhanced rights.

Yet the liberalisation of water has caused grave problems in many countries, where the involvement of foreign multinationals has typically raised water tariffs far beyond the reach of poor households. Any country making GATS commitments in water would bind in such liberalisation for the future, making it effectively impossible for it to reverse the liberalisation - despite its negative impacts on the poor.

There has been massive opposition from across the world to the EU's GATS water requests. Several EU member states have criticised the requests, making charges of EU hypocrisy at a time when (quite rightly) the EU is not offering its own water distribution services for liberalisation under GATS. Even parts of the private sector water industry itself have spoken out against the inclusion of water in the GATS negotiations, and developing countries such as South Africa have called for water to be taken out of GATS altogether.

In view of the potential damage which GATS liberalisation commitments could cause to vulnerable communities worldwide, we call on the EU - and in particular its G8 members: France, Germany, Italy and the UK - to withdraw its water requests of other WTO members immediately.

We also call on the EU to withdraw its proposal to reclassify the GATS category of environmental services, by which it intends to bring 'water for human use' into the current GATS negotiations.

Reposted from www.gatswatch.org


Signatories (May 26 2003):

  1. 11.11.11 (Coalition of the Flemish North South Movement), Belgium
  2. ACME (Association pour un Contrat Mondial sur l'eau), France
  3. Africa-Europe Faith and Justice Network
  4. Agir Ici, France
  5. AIDWATCH, Australia
  6. Alliance for Democracy, United States
  7. Alliance of Progressive Labor (APL), the Philippines
  8. Appropriate Development Panel, United Kingdom
  9. Artjol, Spain
  10. ASEED Europe
  11. ASEED Japan
  12. Asia House, Germany
  13. Asia Pacific Network on Food Sovereignty (APNFS)
  14. Australian Greens
  15. ATTAC Austria
  16. Attac Colombia Madre Tierra
  17. ATTAC Denmark
  18. ATTAC France
  19. ATTAC Italy
  20. ATTAC Japan
  21. ATTAC London, United Kingdom
  22. ATTAC Netherlands
  23. ATTAC Spain
  24. ATTAC Sweden
  25. Bangladesh Krishok Federation
  26. Berne Declaration, Switzerland
  27. Bond Beter Leefmilieu Vlaanderen, Belgium
  28. Both ENDS, Netherlands
  29. Bretton Woods Project, United Kingdom
  30. Bund fr Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (BUND) / Friends of the Earth, Germany
  31. Buro Ver(?)antwoord, the Netherlands
  32. Business Watch Indonesia
  33. Campagna della Riforma della Banca Mondiale (CRBM), Italy
  34. Center for Encounters and Active Nonviolence, Bad Ischl, Austria
  35. Center for International Studies, Managua, Nicaragua
  36. Center for Environmental Public Advocacy, Slovakia
  37. CETIM (Europe - Third World Center), Switzerland
  38. CESTA / Friends of the Earth El Salvador
  39. Citizens' Network on Essential Services, United States
  40. COECOCeiba / Friends of the Earth Costa Rica
  41. Colibri (Globenet3 Germany)
  42. Council of Canadians, Canada
  43. Comitato Italiano per il Contratto Mondiale dell'Acqua, Italy
  44. Comite Social pro Vida, Cochabamba, Bolivia
  45. Coordinadora de Defensa del Agua y de la Vida, Cochabamba, Bolivia
  46. Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO)
  47. Development VISIONS, Pakistan
  48. Dreiknigsaktion/Kath. Jungschar, Austria
  49. Environmental Foundation / Friends of the Earth Sri Lanka
  50. EQUATIONS (Equitable Tourism Options), India
  51. Federacin de Trabajadores Fabriles de Cochabamba, Bolivia
  52. Focus on the Global South, Thailand, India and Philippines
  53. Folkebevegelsen for bevaring av vann som fellesgode, Norway
  54. Foundation for Community Development, Mozambique
  55. Franciscans OFM - Justice, Peace and Integrity of Creation (JPIC) office, Italy
  56. Friends of the Earth Canada
  57. Friends of the Earth Slovakia
  58. Gender and Economic Reforms in Africa, Ghana
  59. GRESEA (Research group for an alternative economic strategy), Belgium
  60. INFOG (Indonesian Forum on Globalization), Indonesia
  61. Initiative Civilcourage, Germany
  62. Initiatives de Dveloppement Stratgique, France
  63. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), United States
  64. Integrated Rural Development Foundation (IRDF), Philippines
  65. Inter-Congregational Environmental Working Group, Italy
  66. International Committee for the Global Water Contract (Lisbon and Brussels)
  67. IRENE Network on Labour and Development, the Netherlands
  68. JACSES, Japan
  69. JPIC Commission of the Society of the Divine Word Missionaries, Japan
  70. JPIC Secretariat of the Claritian Missionaries, Italy
  71. Jubilee Kansai Network, Japan
  72. Jubilee Kyushu on World Debt and Povery, Japan
  73. JustWorld International, France
  74. Kenya Rainwater Association
  75. KOSA Co-ordination Southern Africa, Germany
  76. Lunaria, Italy
  77. Marist Brothers of the Schools - Bureau of International Solidarity, Italy
  78. Mexican Action Network on Free Trade (RMALC), Mexico
  79. Milieudefensie / Friends of the Earth Netherlands
  80. Monitoring Sustainability of Globalization (MSN), Malaysia
  81. Municipal Services Project, South Africa and Canada
  82. Mwelekeo Wa Ngo (MWENGO), Eastern and Southern Africa
  83. Naturschutzbund Vorarlberg, Germany
  84. Nei til EU Sandefjord, Norway
  85. Norwegian Church Aid , Norway
  86. L'Observatoire des transnationales, France
  87. ODA Watchers, Japan
  88. Organisation pour le Renforcement des Capacites de Developpement (ORCADE), Burkina Faso
  89. Oxfam, United Kingdom
  90. Oxfam-Solidarity, Belgium
  91. Polaris Institute, Canada
  92. PROTOS, Belgium
  93. Public Services International (PSI)
  94. Public Citizen, United States
  95. REDES / Friends of the Earth Uruguay
  96. Religious of the Sacred Heart of Mary - JPIC Network, USA
  97. Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology, India
  98. Rete di Lilliput, Italy
  99. Save the Children, United Kingdom
  100. School Sisters of Notre Dame, Italy
  101. Shripad Dharmadhikary, Manthan Adhyayan Kendra, India
  102. Social Watch
  103. SOMO (Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations), The Netherlands
  104. Sweetwater Alliance, Michigan, USA
  105. Tearfund, United Kingdom
  106. Transnational Institute (TNI)
  107. La Unidad Ecologica Salvadorea (UNES), El Salvador
  108. Unione degli Universitari, Italy
  109. UNISON, United Kingdom
  110. VODO (Flemish Platform on Sustainable Development), Belgium
  111. WALHI (Indonesian Forum for Environment) / Friends of the Earth, Indonesia
  112. War on Want, United Kingdom
  113. WaterAid, United Kingdom
  114. Water Pressure Group, Auckland, New Zealand
  115. Water Watch Penang, Malaysia
  116. Wells for India, United Kingdom
  117. Weltumspannend Arbeiten, Austria
  118. WEMOS, the Netherlands
  119. Werkgroep Globalisering Delft-Den Haag, the Netherlands
  120. Women's Intenational League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF), Netherlands section
  121. World Development Movement, United Kingdom
  122. World Economy, Ecology & Development (WEED), Germany
 
 
   

HOME | ABOUT APL | PRESS STATEMENTS | POSITION PAPERS | BASIC DOCUMENTS 
RESOLUTIONS | AFFILIATES  | LINKS

Alliance of Progressive Labor (APL) 2003
Manila, Philippines

email: info@apl.org.ph

www.apl.org.ph